Studying the Genotype × Environment Interaction and Grain Yield Stability of Winter Oilseed Rape Mutant Lines Using Parametric, Non-Parametric and SIIG Index Methods

Mehripour Azbarmi, Hossein; Saba, Jalal; Alizadeh, Bahram; Gholizadeh, Amir; Shekari, Farid

doi:10.22034/PGR.11.1.7

[Home ] [Archive]

[ فارسی ]

Main Menu

Home

Journal Information

Articles archive

For Authors

For Reviewers

Registration

Contact us

Site Facilities

Search in website

Receive site information

Volume 11, Issue 1 (2024)

pgr 2024, 11(1): 103-120

Back to browse issues page

Studying the Genotype × Environment Interaction and Grain Yield Stability of Winter Oilseed Rape Mutant Lines Using Parametric, Non-Parametric and SIIG Index Methods

Hossein Mehripour Azbarmi

, Jalal Saba

, Bahram Alizadeh ^*

, Amir Gholizadeh

, Farid Shekari

Oil Crops Research Department, Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran , ba.alizadeh@areeo.ac.ir

Abstract: (389 Views)

The genotype × environment interaction is a major challenge in studying quantitative characters because it reduces grain yield stability in different environments. In this regard, to analysis the genotype × environment interactions and to determine the yield stability of winter rapeseed mutant lines, 9 lines and 6 cultivars were evaluated in a randomized complete block design with three replications in six experimental field stations (Esfahan, Hamedan, Karaj, Kermanshah, Qazvin and Zarghan) during 2021–2023 croping seasons. The combined analysis of variance indicated that the effects of environments, genotypes and genotype × environment interaction were significant, suggesting that the genotypes responded differently in the studied environment conditions. So, there was the possibility of stability analysis. According to the stability analysis results using the Eberhart and Russel method, the Talaye cultivar with higher grain yield than overall mean and regression coefficient equal to one (b_i=1) was identified as the genotype with high general stability for all regions. Based on the simultaneous selection method for yield and stability (YSi), the lines Z-900-6, T-1200-1, and Talaye cultivar with the lowest values were stable, whereas Zarafam, Okapi and Express cultivars with the highest values were unstable. Also, based on the SIIG index, the lines Z-900-6, T-1200-1, and Talaye cultivar with having high SIIG values as well as higher grain yields that total average was recognized as superior genotypes from the point of stability and grain yield. According to the results of cluster analysis, Karaj, Zarghan, Kermanshah and Isfahan locations were located in a group that indicates these locations had high predictability and repeatability power.

Keywords: Broad adaptability, Eberhart and Russel method, Simultaneous selection for yield and stability, Winter rapeseed

Full-Text [PDF 674 kb] (37 Downloads)

Type of Study: Research | Subject: Plant improvement

References

1. Abyar, S., Navabpour, S., Karimizadeh, R., Nasrollahnejad ghomi, A.A., Kiani, G.H. and Gholizadeh, A. (2021). Evaluation of genotype × environment interaction and grain yield stability of different bread wheat genotypes using non-parametric methods. Cereal Research, 11(2): 89-104 (In Persian).

2. Ahmadi, J., Vaezi, B. and Pour-Aboughadareh, A. (2016). Evaluation of forage yield stability of advanced lines of grass pea (Lathyrus sativa L.) by parametric and non-parametric methods. Journal of Crop Breeding, 8: 149-159 (In Persian). [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.jcb.8.17.159]

3. Ahmadpour, S., Darvishzadeh, R., Sofalian, O. and Hatamzadeh, H. (2019). Evaluation of yield stability of sunflower inbred lines under salt stress conditions. Journal of Crop Breeding, 11: 1-10 (In Persian). [DOI:10.29252/jcb.11.30.1]

4. Akbari, S., Akbarpour, O. and Pezeshkpour, P. (2022). Evaluation of grain yield stability of lentil genotypes using parametric methods in rainfed conditions of khorramabad. Journal of Crop Breeding, 14(44): 227-238 (In Persian). [DOI:10.52547/jcb.14.44.227]

5. Akbarpour, O.A., Dehghani, H., Sorkhi-Lalelo, B. and Kang, M.S. (2016). A SAS macro for computing statistical tests for two-way table and stability indices of nonparametric method from genotype-by-environment interaction. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 38: 35-50 [DOI:10.4025/actasciagron.v38i1.26381]

6. Akbarpour, O., Dehghani, H. and Sorkhi-Lalehloo, B. (2012). Study of grain yield stability of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) promising lines in cold regions of Iran using regression methods. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 14: 155-170 (In Persian).

7. Alishah, O., MahmoodJanloo, H., Hekmat, M.H., Naderi Arefi, A., Sidmasoomi, S.Y. and Talat, F. (2019). Investigation of genotype × environment interaction and yield stability of hopeful cotton (G. hirsutum L.) genotypes. Journal of Crop Breeding, 11: 226-236 (In Persian). [DOI:10.29252/jcb.11.31.226]

8. Alizadeh, B., Rezaizad, A., Yazdandoost Hamedani, M., Shiresmaeili, G., Nasserghadimi, F., Khademhamzeh, H.R. and Gholizadeh, A. (2021a). Analysis of genotype × environment interaction for seed yield in winter rapeseed cultivars and lines using multivariate method of additive main effects and multiplicative interaction. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 11(1): 95-108 (In Persian). [DOI:10.47176/jcpp.11.1.36131]

9. Alizadeh, B., Rezaizad, A., Yazdandoost Hamedani, M., Shiresmaeili, G., Nasserghadimi, F. and Khademhamzeh, H.R. (2021b). Investigation of genotype × environment interaction and seed yield stability of rapeseed genotypes in cold and mild cold regions of Iran. Plant Genetic Researches, 7(2): 65-82 (In Persian). [DOI:10.52547/pgr.7.2.6]

10. Alizadeh, B., Rezaizad, A., Yazdandoost Hamedani, M., Shiresmaeili, G., Nasserghadimi, F., Khademhamzeh, H.R. and Gholizadeh, A. (2022). Genotype × environment interactions and simultaneous selection for high seed yield and stability in winter rapeseed (Brassica napus) multi-environment trials. Agricultural Research, 11(2): 185-196. [DOI:10.1007/s40003-021-00565-9]

11. Alizadeh, B., Rezaizad, A., Yazdandoost Hamedani, M., Shiresmaeili, G., Nasserghadimi, F., Khademhamzeh, H.R. and Gholizadeh, A. (2020). Evaluation of seed yield stability of winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) genotypes using non-parametric methods. Journal of Crop Breeding, 12(35): 202-212 (In Persian).

12. Alizadeh, B., Yazdandust Hamedani, M., Rezaei Zad, A., Azizinia, S., Khiyavi, M., Shirani Rad, A.H., Javidfar, F., Pasban Eslam, B., Mostafavi Rad, M., Shariati, F., Rahmanpour Ozan, S., Alem Khumaram, M.H., Majd Nasiri, B., Amiri Oghan, A. and Zareei Siahbidi, A. (2019). Nima, new winter oilseed rape variety for cultivation in the cold and moderately cold regions of Iran. Research Achievements for Field and Horticulture Crops, 8: 61-76 (In Persian).

13. Becker, H. (1981). Correlations among some statistical measures of phenotypic stability. Euphytica, 30: 835-840. [DOI:10.1007/BF00038812]

14. Becker, H. and Leon, J. (1988). Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding, 101: 1-23. [DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0523.1988.tb00261.x]

15. Dezfouli, P.M., Sedghi, M., Shariatpanahi, M.E., Niazian, M. and Alizadeh, B. (2019). Assessment of general and specific combining abilities in doubled haploid lines of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Industrial Crops and Products, 141: 111754. [DOI:10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111754]

16. Dorrani-Nejad, M. and Mohammadi-Nejad, G. (2018). Stability analysis for seed yield in different fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) ecotypes using Eberhart-Russel regression and different univariate statistics methods. Journal of Crop Breeding, 10: 19-27 (In Persian). [DOI:10.29252/jcb.10.25.19]

17. Ebadi, A., Sabaghpour, S.H., Dehghani, H. and Kamrani, M. (2008). Non-parametric measures of phenotypic stability in chickpea genotypes (Cicer arietinum L.). Euphytica, 162: 221-229. [DOI:10.1007/s10681-007-9552-x]

18. Eberhart, S.T. and Russell, W. (1966). Stability parameters for comparing varieties 1. Crop Science, 6: 36-40. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x]

19. Esmaeilzadeh Moghaddam, M., Tahmasebi, S., Lotf Ali Ayeneh, G.A., Akbari Moghadam, H., Mahmoudi, M., Sayyahfar, M., Tabib Ghaffari, S.M. and Zali, H. (2018). Yield stability evaluation of bread wheat promising lines using multivariate methods. Cereal Research, 8: 333-344 (In Persian).

20. Farshadfar, E. and Sutka, J. (2006). Biplot analysis of genotype-environment interaction in durum wheat using the AMMI model. Acta Agronomica Hungarica, 54: 459-467. [DOI:10.1556/AAgr.54.2006.4.8]

21. Finlay, K. and Wilkinson, G. (1963) The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 14: 742-754. [DOI:10.1071/AR9630742]

22. Fooladvand, M., Shahsavand, H., Mohamadinejad, G. and Parvizi, M. (2013). Genotype by environment interaction and study of sugar yield stability in the sugarcane cultivars in Khuzestan locations by stability criteria. Cereal Research, 2: 31-44 (In Persian).

23. Francis, T. and Kannenberg, L. (1978). Yield stability studies in short-season maize. I. A descriptive method for grouping genotypes. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 58: 1029-1034. [DOI:10.4141/cjps78-157]

24. Ghaffari, M., Gholizadeh, A., Andarkhor, S.A., Zareei Siahbidi, A., Kalantar Ahmadi, S.A., Shariati, F. and Rezaeizad, A. (2022). Evaluation of seed yield stability of sunflower genotypes using non-parametric statistics. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 12(1): 1-13 (In Persian).

25. Ghaffari, M., Gholizadeh, A., Andarkhor, S.A., Zareei Siahbidi, A., Kalantar Ahmadi, S.A., Shariati, F. and Rezaeizad, A. (2021). Stability and genotype × environment analysis of oil yield of sunflower single cross hybrids in diverse environments of Iran. Euphytica, 217(10): 187. [DOI:10.1007/s10681-021-02921-w]

26. Gholizadeh, A., Khodadadi, M. and Sharifi-Zagheh, A. (2022). Evaluation of genotype × environment interaction for essential oil yield of coriander genotypes under different irrigation conditions using GGE biplot method. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences, 15(1): 43-52 (In Persian).

27. Hühn, M. (1979). Beitrage zur erfassung der phanotypischen stabilitat. EDV Med Biol, 10: 112-117.

28. Hühn, M. and Leon, J. (1995). Nonparametric analysis of cultivar performance trials: experimental results and comparison of different procedures based on ranks. Agronomy Journal, 87: 627-632. [DOI:10.2134/agronj1995.00021962008700040004x]

29. Jafari, M., Asghari, Z.R., Alizadeh, B., Sofalian, O. and Zare, N. (2015). Study of seed yield stability in winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) genotypes using Eberhart and Russell's method. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 45: 585-592 (In Persian).

30. Jamshidmoghaddam, M. and Pourdad, S.S. (2013). Genotype × environment interactions for seed yield in rainfed winter safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) multi-environment trials in Iran. Euphytica, 190: 357-369. [DOI:10.1007/s10681-012-0776-z]

31. Kang, M. (1988). A rank-sum method for selecting high-yielding, stable corn genotypes. Cereal Research Communication, 16: 113-115.

32. Karimizadeh, R., Safikhani Nasimi, M., Mohammadi, M., Seyyedi, F., Mahmoodi, A. and Rostami, B. (2008). Determining Rank and Stability of Lentil Genotypes in Rainfed Condition by Nonparametric Statistics. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 12: 93-102 (In Persian).

33. Moghaddaszadeh, M., Asghari Zakaria, R., Hassanpanah, D. and Zare, N. (2018). Non-parametric stability analysis of tuber yield in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) genotype. Journal of Crop Breeding, 28: 50-63 (In Persian). [DOI:10.29252/jcb.10.28.50]

34. Mohammadi, M., Karimizadeh, R., Hosseinpour, T., Ghojogh, H., Shahbazi, K. and Sharifi, P. (2018). Use of parametric and non-parametric methods for genotype × environment interaction analysis in bread wheat genotypes. Plant Genetic Researches, 4: 75-88 (In Persian). [DOI:10.29252/pgr.4.2.75]

35. Movahhedi, Z., Dehghani, H. and Mofidian, M. (2010). A study of yield stability in cold region ecotypes of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) through non-parametric measures. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 40: 103-111 (In Persian).

36. Najafi Mirak, T., Dastfal, M., Andarzian, B., Farzadi, H., Bahari, M. and Zali, H. (2018). Assessment of non-parametric methods in selection of stable genotypes of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum). Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 20: 126-138 (In Persian).

37. Nassar, R. and Hühn, M. (1987). Studies on estimation of phenotypic stability: Tests of significance for nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Biometrics, 43: 45-53. [DOI:10.2307/2531947]

38. Nowosad, K., Liersch, A., Popławska, W. and Bocianowski, J. (2016). Genotype by environment interaction for seed yield in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) using additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model. Euphytica, 208: 187-194. [DOI:10.1007/s10681-015-1620-z]

39. Pinthus, J.M. (1973). Estimate of genotype value: a proposed method. Euphytica, 22: 121-123. [DOI:10.1007/BF00021563]

40. Plaisted, R. and Peterson, L. (1959) A technique for evaluating the ability of selections to yield consistently in different locations or seasons. American Journal of Potato Research, 36: 381-385. [DOI:10.1007/BF02852735]

41. Pour-Aboughadareh, A., Yousefian, M., Moradkhani, H., Poczai, P., Kadambot, H. and Siddique, M. (2019). STABILITYSOFT: A new online program to calculate parametric and non-parametric stability statistics for crop traits. Applications in Plant Sciences, 7(1): e01211. [DOI:10.1002/aps3.1211]

42. Pourdad, S., Moghaddam, M., Faraji, A. and Naraki, H. (2014). Study on different non-parametric stability methods on seed yield of spring rapeseed varieties and hybrids. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 44: 539-548 (In Persian).

43. Ramzi, E., Asghari, A., Sofalian, O., Mehraban, A. and Ebadi, A. (2020). Evaluation of grain yield stability and genotype-environment interaction of barley promising lines in warm and humid regions of the country. Journal of Crop Breeding, 12(36): 57-65 (In Persian). [DOI:10.52547/jcb.12.36.57]

44. Sabaghnia, N., Dehghani, H. and Sabaghpour, S.H. (2006). Nonparametric methods for interpreting genotype × environment interaction of lentil genotypes. Crop Science, 46: 1100-1106. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2005.06-0122]

45. Sheikh, F., Sharifi, H., Asteraki, H., Miri, K. and Sekhavat, R. (2021). Evaluation stability of seed yield of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) genotypes by parametric and non-parametric methods. Crop Production, 14(3): 125-144 (In Persian).

46. Shukla, G. (1972). Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype environmental components of variability. Heredity, 29: 237-245. [DOI:10.1038/hdy.1972.87]

47. Thennarasu, K. (1995). On certain non-parametric procedures for studying genotype-environment interactions and yield stability. Dissertation, University of New Delhi, IND.

48. Vaezi, B., Pour-Aboughadareh, A., Mohammadi, R., Armion, M., Mehraban, A., Hossein-Pour, T. and Dorii, M. (2017). GGE biplot and AMMI analysis of barley yield performance in Iran. Cereal Research Communications, 45: 500-511. [DOI:10.1556/0806.45.2017.019]

49. Vaezi, B., Pour-Aboughadareh, A., Mohammadi, R., Mehraban, A., Hossein-Pour, T., Koohkan, E., Ghasemi, S., Moradkhani, H. and Siddique, K.H. (2019). Integrating different stability models to investigate genotype × environment interactions and identify stable and high-yielding barley genotypes. Euphytica, 215: 63. [DOI:10.1007/s10681-019-2386-5]

50. Wachira, F., Ng'etich, W., Omolo, J. and Mamati, G. (2002). Genotype × environment interactions for tea yields. Euphytica, 127: 289-297. [DOI:10.1023/A:1020273616349]

51. Wricke, G. (1962). Uber eine Methode zur Erfassung der okologischen Streubreite in Feldverzuchen. Zeitschr F Pflanzenz, 47: 92-96.

52. Yan, W. and Kang, M.S. (2003). GGE Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists and Agronomists. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA. [DOI:10.1201/9781420040371]

53. Yan, W. and Rajcan, I. (2002). Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Science, 42: 11-20. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2002.1100]

54. Zali, H., Hasanloo, T., Sofalian, O., Asghari, A. and Zeinalabedini, M. (2016). Appropriate strategies for selection of drought tolerant genotypes in canola. Journal of Crop Breeding, 8(20): 77-90 (In Persian). [DOI:10.29252/jcb.8.18.191]

55. Zali, H., Sofalian, O., Hasanloo, T., Asgharii, A. and Hoseini, S.M.M. (2015). Appraising of drought tolerance relying on stability analysis indices in canola genotypes simultaneously, using selection index of ideal genotype (SIIG) technique: Introduction of new method. Biological Forum-An International Journal, 7(2): 703-711.

Send email to the article author

‎ 10.22034/PGR.11.1.7

Mendeley

Zotero

RefWorks

Mehripour Azbarmi H, Saba J, Alizadeh B, Gholizadeh A, Shekari F. Studying the Genotype × Environment Interaction and Grain Yield Stability of Winter Oilseed Rape Mutant Lines Using Parametric, Non-Parametric and SIIG Index Methods. pgr 2024; 11 (1) :103-120
URL: http://pgr.lu.ac.ir/article-1-310-en.html

Rights and permissions
	This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Volume 11, Issue 1 (2024)

Back to browse issues page

Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4657