[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: About :: Main :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..



 
..
:: Volume 11, Issue 1 (2024) ::
pgr 2024, 11(1): 47-76 Back to browse issues page
Evaluation of Some Selection Indices to Improve Sunflower Seed Yield Under Normal and Drought Stress Conditions
Nasrin Akbari , Reza Darvishzadeh *
Department of Production Engineering and Plant Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran , r.darvishzadeh@urmia.ac.ir
Abstract:   (436 Views)
Sunflower, one of the important oilseed plants, is affected by drought stress, consequently leading to yield decreases. Direct selection for improving seed yield, as the end product of multiple traits, is often ineffective due to the significant impact of environmental conditions. For many years, indirect selection through other traits or selection indices has been proposed to improve seed yield. In the present experiment, 100 oilseed sunflower genotypes were evaluated in terms of some agro-morphological traits using a simple 10 × 10 lattice design under normal and drought stress conditions during two consecutive croping seasons. In drought stress conditions, irrigation was applied after 180 mm of evaporation from class A evaporation pan, compared to 90 mm in normal irrigation conditions. Brim, Smith-Hazel, Robinson and Pesek-Baker selection indices were calculated to select genotypes under two environmental conditions. In order to evaluate and compare the efficiency of selection indices and select the best index, the genetic gain of traits (∆G), expected gain (∆H) and relative efficiency of selection index (RE) were calculated. The results of this study showed that the direct response to selection for the traits including kernel oil content, days to maturity and leaf length under both environmental conditions was more favorable compared to the correlated response. However, for head and stem diameter traits, the lowest efficiency of direct selection was observed under both environmental conditions compared to other investigated traits. Considering the two criteria; the genetic gain of traits (∆G) and expected gain (∆H) under normal and drought stress conditions, the two indexes of Brim and Smith-Hazel were introduced as the best index and the genotype ENSAT-254 was introduced as the superior genotype. The selected ENSAT-254 genotype can be considered in developing hybrid cultivars for cultivation under drought stress conditions, provided it is validated at the molecular level by analyzing the expression of genes related to water deficit stress tolerance.
Keywords: Water deficit stress, Morphological traits, Direct selection, Oilseed crops
Full-Text [PDF 1064 kb]   (31 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Plant improvement
References
1. Ahmadpour, S., Darvishzadeh, R. and Sofalian, O. (2018). Selection Indices for Yield Improvement of Sunflower under Normal and Salt Stress Conditions. Journal of Crop Breeding, 10(25): 91-100 (In Persian). [DOI:10.29252/jcb.10.25.91]
2. Akbari, N. and Darvishzadeh, R. (2023). Identification of IRAP markers associated with agromorphological traits in oil seed sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under normal and water limited conditions. Cellular and Molecular Research (Iranian Journal of Biology), 4(36): 343-357 (In Persian).
3. Andrade, A.C.B., Silva, A.J., Ferraudo, A.S., Unêda-Trevisoli, S.H. and Mauro, A.S. (2016). Strategies for selecting soybean genotypes using mixed models and multivariate approach. African Journal of Agricutural Research, 11: 23-31.
4. Barth, E., de Resende, J.T.V., Mariguele, K.H., de Resende, M.D.V., da Silva, A.L.B.R. and Ru, S. (2022). Multivariate analysis methods improve the selection of strawberry genotypes with low cold requirement. Scientific Reports, 12:11458. [DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-15688-4]
5. Bernardo, R. (2010). Breeding for Quantitative Traits in Plants. Woodbury: Stemma Press, Minnesota, USA.
6. Baker, R.J. (1986). Selection Indices in Plant Breeding: CRC Press, Inc. Boca Raton, Florida, USA.
7. Brim, C.A., Johnson, H.W. and Cockerham, C.C. (1959). Multiple selection criteria in soybeans. Agronomy Journal, 51: 42-46. [DOI:10.2134/agronj1959.00021962005100010015x]
8. Charles, B. and Heiser, Jr. (1955). The origin and development of the cultivated sunflower, university of California press on behalf of the national association of biology teachers. The American Biology Teacher, 17(5): 161-167. [DOI:10.2307/4438706]
9. Carvalho, A.D.F., Nogueira, M.T.M., Silva, G.O., Luz, J.M.Q., Maciel, G.M. and Rabelo, P.G. (2017). Seleção de genótipos de cenoura para caracteres fenotípicos de raiz. Horticultura Brasileira, 35: 97-102. [DOI:10.1590/s0102-053620170115]
10. Crispim‐Filho, A.J., Dos Santos, F.P., Pinto, J.F.N., Melo, P.G.S., Dos Reis, E.F. and Mendes‐Resende, M.P. (2020). Dealing with multiple traits in maize: A new approach for selecting progenies. Crop Science, 60(6): 3151-3165. [DOI:10.1002/csc2.20292]
11. Dovale, J.C., Fritsche-Neto, R. and Silva, P.S.L. (2011). Índice de seleção para cultivares de milho com dupla aptidão: minimilho e milho verde. Bragantia, 70: 781-787. [DOI:10.1590/S0006-87052011000400008]
12. Ebrahimian, E., Seyyedi, S.M., Bybordi, A. and Damalas, C.A. (2019). Seed yield and oil quality of sunflower, safflower, and sesame under different levels of irrigation water availability. Agricultural Water Management, 218: 149-157. [DOI:10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.031]
13. Falconer, D.S. and Mackay, T.F.C. (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longmans Green, Harlow, Essex, UK.
14. Falconer, D.S., Mackay, T.F. and Frankham R. (1996). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics (4th ed.). Trends in Genetics, 12(7): 280. [DOI:10.1016/0168-9525(96)81458-2]
15. Fernandez, O., Urrutia, M., Berton, T., Bernillon, S., Deborde, C., Jacob, D., Maucourt, M., Maury, P., Durufé, H., Gibon, Y., Langlade, N.B. and Moing, A. (2019). Metabolomic characterization of sunfower leaf allows discriminating genotype groups or stress levels with a minimal set of metabolic markers. Metabolomics, 15: 56. [DOI:10.1007/s11306-019-1515-4]
16. Hashemzehi, M., Moradgholi, A. and Ghasemi, A. (2013). Evaluation of responses of mung bean (Vigna radiata) genotypes to drought stress using different stress tolerance indices. Journal of Crop Breeding, 5(12): 112-122 (In Persian).
17. Hazel, L.N. and Lush, J.L. (1942). The Efficiency of Three Methods of Selection. Journal of Heredity, 33(11): 393-399. [DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a105102]
18. Hazel, L.N. (1943). The genetic basis for constructing selection indices. Genetics, 28: 476-490. [DOI:10.1093/genetics/28.6.476]
19. Kang, M. (1994). Applied Quantitative Genetics. Kang. In: MS Publisher, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
20. Khavari Khorasani, S. and Mahdi Poor, A. (2018). Genetic improvement of grain yield by determination of selection index in single cross hybrids of maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Genetic Researches, 5(1): 1-18. (In Persian). [DOI:10.29252/pgr.5.1.1]
21. Leilah, A.A. and Al-Khateeb, S.A. (2005). Statistical analysis of wheat yield under drought conditions. Journal of Arid Environments, 61: 483-96. [DOI:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.10.011]
22. Li, Z., Xiang, F., Huang, X., Liang, M., Ma, S., Gafurov, K., Gu, F., Guo, Q. and Wang, Q. (2024). Properties and Characterization of Sunflower Seeds from Different Varieties of Edible and Oil Sunflower Seeds. Foods, 13: 1188. [DOI:10.3390/foods13081188]
23. Lima, V.J., Freitas Junior, S.P., Souza, Y.P. Silva, C.S. Farias, J.E.C., Souza, R.F., Chaves, M.M. and Feitosa, J.V. (2018). Genetic gain capitalization in the first cycle of recurrent selection in popcorn at Ceará's Cariri. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias, 13: e5556. [DOI:10.5039/agraria.v13i3a5556]
24. Marhtwe, N., Aye, M. and Nyein Thu, M. (2020). Selection index for yield and yield contributing traits inimproved rice genotypes. International Journal of Environmental and Rural Development, 11(2): 86-91.
25. Pesek, J. and Baker, R. (1970). An application of index selection to the improvement of self-pollinated species. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 50(3): 267-276. [DOI:10.4141/cjps70-051]
26. Radanovíc, A., Miladinovic, D., Cvejic, S., Jockovic, M. and Jocic, S. (2018). Sunflower Genetics from Ancestors to Modern Hybrids-A Review. Genes, 9: 528. [DOI:10.3390/genes9110528]
27. Rahimi, M. and Rabiei, B. (2011). The application of selection indices improvement of grain yield hn rica(Oriza sativa). Agronomy Journal (Pajouhash and Sazandegi), 90: 39-46 (In Persian).
28. Rana, M., Sood, A., Hussain, W., Kaldate, R., Sharma, T.R., Gill, R.K., Kumar, S. and Singh, S. (2019). Gene pyramiding and multiple character breeding (Chapter 6). In: Mohar Singh, M., Ed., Lentils, pp. 83-121. Headquarters location, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-813522-8.00006-6]
29. Raza, A., Mubarik, M.S., Sharif, R., Habib, M., Jabeen, W., Zhang, C., Chen, H., Chen, Z.H., Siddique, K.H.M., Zhuang, W. and Varshney, R.K. (2023). Developing drought-smart, ready to grow future crops. Plant Genome, 10: e20279. [DOI:10.1002/tpg2.20279]
30. Rauf, S. (2008). Breeding sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) for drought tolerance. Commun. Biometry Crop Science, 3: 29-44.
31. Robinson, H.F., Comstock, R.E. and Harvey, P.H. (1951). Genotypic and phenotypic correlation and their implications in selection. Agronomy Journal, 43: 282-287. [DOI:10.2134/agronj1951.00021962004300060007x]
32. Seiler, G.J., Qi, L.L. and Marek, L.F. (2017). Utilization of sunflower crop wild relatives for cultivated sunflower improvement. Crop Science, 57: 1083-1101. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci2016.10.0856]
33. Shiri, M. and Ebrahimi, L. (2018). Comprehensive SAS code for computing several selection indices. Journal of Crop Improvement, 32(2): 225-238. [DOI:10.1080/15427528.2017.1407855]
34. Smith, H.F. (1936). A discriminant function for plant selection. Annals of Eugenics, 7(3): 240-250. [DOI:10.1111/j.1469-1809.1936.tb02143.x]
35. Tahmasbali, M., Darvishzadeh, R. and Fayaz Moghaddam, A. (2021). Evaluation of oriental tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) genotypes using selection indices under the presence and absence of broomrape. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 52(3): 189-20 (In Persian).
36. Tahmasebi, A., Darvishzadeh, R., Fayaz Moghadam, A., Gholinejhad, E. and Abdi, H. (2022). Using selection indices to improve seed yield in native sesame stands. Plant Genetic Researches, 8(2): 117-130 (In Persian). [DOI:10.52547/pgr.8.2.9]
37. Williams, J.S. (1962).The evaluation of a selection index. Biometrics, 18: 375-393.
Send email to the article author



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Akbari N, Darvishzadeh R. Evaluation of Some Selection Indices to Improve Sunflower Seed Yield Under Normal and Drought Stress Conditions. pgr 2024; 11 (1) :47-76
URL: http://pgr.lu.ac.ir/article-1-301-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 11, Issue 1 (2024) Back to browse issues page
پژوهش های ژنتیک گیاهی Plant Genetic Researches
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 38 queries by YEKTAWEB 4657