[صفحه اصلی ]   [Archive] [ English ]  
:: صفحه اصلي :: درباره نشريه :: آخرين شماره :: تمام شماره‌ها :: جستجو :: ثبت نام :: ارسال مقاله :: تماس با ما ::
:: دوره 7، شماره 2 - ( 1399 ) ::
جلد 7 شماره 2 صفحات 40-25 برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
ارزیابی اثر متقابل ژنوتیپ × محیط و ‌تعیین پایداری عملکرد دانه ژنوتیپ‌های گندم دوروم در آزمایش‌های یکنواخت سراسری مناطق نیمه‌گرمسیر دیم
رحمت الله کریمی زاده*، طهماسب حسین پور، جبار آلت‌جعفربای، کمال شهبازی هومونلو، محمد آرمیون
چکیده:   (4350 مشاهده)
روش‌های مختلفی برای بررسی اثر متقابل ژنوتیپ × محیط و شناسایی ژنوتیپ‌های پایدار وجود دارد که شامل روش‌های پارامتری، ناپارامتری و چندمتغیره است. در این پژوهش، تعداد 19 ژنوتیپ پیشرفته گندم دوروم انتخابی از آزمایش‌های پیشرفته مقایسه عملکرد سال زراعی 91-1390 به‌همراه رقم شاهد دهدشت به‌مدت سه سال زراعی (94-1391) در پنج منطقه گچساران، گنبد، خرم‌آباد، مغان و ایلام به‌صورت طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی در چهار تکرار مطالعه ‌شدند. تجزیه مرکب داده‌ها اثر معنی‌دار محیط، ژنوتیپ و اثر متقابل ژنوتیپ در محیط را نشان داد. در روش‌های تک‌متغیره پارامتری، ژنوتیپ‌های شماره 7، 12، 18 و 20 پایدارترین ژنوتیپ‌ها بودند. در روش‌های تک‌متغیره ناپارامتری، ژنوتیپ‌های شماره 2، 7، 12، 13، 18، 19 و 20 با کمترین سهم در اثر متقابل ژنوتیپ و محیط به‌عنوان پایدارترین ژنوتیپ‌ها انتخاب شدند. در روش‌ امی، ژنوتیپ‌های 2، 7، 12، 19 و 20 با اختصاص کمترین مقادیر رتبه در محیط‌های مختلف و بالاترین میانگین عملکرد دانه در گروه ژنوتیپ‌های پایدار قرار گرفتند. با توجه به نتایج به‌دست‌آمده، ژنوتیپ‌های 12، 20، 18 و 7 می‌توانند به‌عنوان ژنوتیپ‌های امیدبخش و کاندیدای معرفی به‌عنوان رقم انگاشته شوند.
واژه‌های کلیدی: پایداری عملکرد، روش امی، ژنوتیپ، گندم دوروم، ناپارامتری
متن کامل [PDF 663 kb]   (491 دریافت)    
نوع مطالعه: پژوهشي | موضوع مقاله: ژنتیک کلاسیک و ژنتیک جمعیت
دریافت: 1399/3/12 | پذیرش: 1400/2/6
فهرست منابع
1. Aghaee-Sarbarzeh, M., Dastfal, M., Farzadi, H., Andarzian, A., Shahbazpour Shahbazi, A., Bahari, M., and Rostami, H. (2012). Evaluation of durum wheat genotypes for yield and yield stability in warm and dry areas of Iran. Seed and Plant Journal, 28-1(2): 315-325 (In Persian).
2. Aghaee-Sarbarzeh, M., Safari, H., Rostaei, M., Nadermahmoodi, K., Pour Siahbidi, M.M., Hesami, A., Solaimani, K., Ahmadi, M.M. and Mohammadi, R. (2007). Study of general and specific adaptation in dryland advance wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) lines using GE biplot based on AMMI model. Pajouhesh & Sazandegi, 77: 41-48 (In Persian).
3. Akcura, M., Kaya, Y., Taner, S., and Ayranici, R. (2006). Parametric stability analysis for grain yield of durum wheat. Plant Soil Environment, 52: 254-261.
4. Eberhart, S.A. and Russell, W.A. (1966). Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science, 6‎: 36-40.
5. Esmailzadeh Moghaddam, M., Zakizadeh, M., Akbari Moghaddam, H., Abedini Esfahlani, M., Sayahfar, M., Nikzad, A.R., Tabib Ghafari S.M., and Lotfali Ayeneh, G.A. (2011). Genotype × environment interaction and stability of grain yield of bread wheat genotypes in dry and warm areas of Iran. Seed and Plant Journal, 27(2): 257-273 (In Persian).
6. Finlay, K.W. and Wilkinson, G.N. (1963). The analysis of adaptation in plant-breeding programs. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 14: 742-754.
7. Flores, F., Moreno, M.T., and Cubero, J.I. (1998). A Comparison of univariate and multivariate methods to analyze G × E interaction. Field Crop Research, 56: 271-286.
8. Fox, P.N., Skovmand, B., Thompson, B.K. and Braun, H.J. (1990). Yield and adaptation of hexaploid spring triticale. Euphytica, 47(1): 57-64.
9. Francis, T.R. and Kannenberg, L.W. (1978). Yield stability studies in short - season maize. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 58‎: 1025-1034.
10. Ghaedrahmati, M., Hossein Pour, T. and Ahmadi, A. (2017). Study of Grain Yield Stability of Durum Wheat Genotypes using AMMI. Journal of Crop Breeding, 9(23): 67-75 (In Persian).
11. Gauch, H.G. and Zobel, R.W. (1996). AMMI Analysis of yield Trials. In: Kang, M.S. and GauchJr., H.G., Eds., Genotype by Environment Interaction, pp. 85-122. CRC Press, Boca Raton, New York, USA. [DOI:10.1201/9781420049374.ch4]
12. Gauch, H.G. and Zobel, R.W. (1997) Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes. Crop Science, 37: 311-326. [DOI:10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700020002x]
13. Genstat. (2008). Genstat Release 11. VSN International Ltd, Waterhouse, Waterhouse Street, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire HP1 1ES, UK.
14. Haji Mohammad Ali Jahromi, M., Khodarahmi, M., Mohammadi, A.R. and Mohammadi, A. (2011). Stability analysis for grain yield of promising durum wheat genotypes in southern warm and dry agro-climatic zone of Iran. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 13 (3): 565-579 (In Persian).
15. Hernandez, C.M., Crossa, J., and Castillo, A. (1993). The area under the function: an index for selecting desirable genotypes. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 87: 409-415.
16. Huhn, M. (1990). Nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability: II. Applications. Euphytica, 47: 195-201.
17. Huhn, M. and Leon, J. (1995). Nonparametric analysis of cultivar performance trials: experimental results and comparison of different procedures based on ranks. Agronomy Journal, 87: 627-632.
18. Kang, M.S. (1988) A rank-sum method for selecting high yielding stable corn genotypes. Cereal Research Communications, 16: 113-115.
19. Karimizadeh, R., Mohammadi, M., Sheikh Mamo, V., Bavi, T. Hosseinpour, H., Khanzadeh, H., Ghojogh, H. and Armion, M. (2011). Application of multi-variate methods in determining grain yield stability of durum wheat genotypes in semi-warm dry land areas of Iran. Modern Genetics, 6(25-2): 33-48 (In Persian).
20. Karimizadeh, R., Mohammadi, M., and Shefazadeh. M.K. (2012b). A review on parametric stability analysis methods: Set up by MATLAB program. International Journal of Agricutural Research, Reviews, 2(4): 433-442.
21. Kaya, Y. and Ozer, E. (2014). parametric stability analyses of multi-environment yield trials in triticale (Triticosecale Wittmack). Genetika, 46(3): 705-718.
22. Kaya, Y. and Turkoz, M. (2016). Evaluation of genotype by environment interaction for grain yield in durum wheat using non-parametric stability statistics. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 21(1): 51-59.
23. Kosina, P., Reynolds, M., Dixon, J. and Joshi, A. (2007). Stakeholder perception of wheat production constraints, capacity building needs, and research partnerships in developing countries. Euphytica, 157: 475-483.
24. Lin, C.S. and Binns, M.R. (1988). A method of analyzing cultivar× location× year experiments: A new stability parameter. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 75: 425-430.
25. Lu, H.Y. (1995). PC-SAS program for estimation Huhn nonparametric stability statistics. Agronomy Journal, 87: 888-891.
26. Mohammadi, M.R., Karimizadeh, T., Hosseinpour, H., Ghojogh, Shahbazi, K. and Sharifi, P. (2017). Use of pparametric and non-pparametric methods for genotype × environment interaction analysis in bread wheat genotypes. Journal of Plant Genetic Researches, 4(2): 75-88 (In Persian).
27. Mohammadi, R., Armion, M., Zadhassan, E. and Eskandari, M. (2014). Analysis of genotype × environment interaction for grain yield in rainfed durum wheat. Iranian Journal of Dryland Agriculture, 1: 1-15 (In Persian).
28. Mohammadi, R., Abdullahi, A., Haghparast, R., Aghaee, M. and Rostaii, M. (2007). Nonparametric methods for evaluating of winter wheat genotypes in multi-environment trials. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3(2): 137-242.
29. Mohammadi, R., Aghaee, M., Haghparast, R., Pourdad, S.S., Rostaii, M., Ansari. Y., Abdullahi, A. and Amri, A. (2009). Association among non-parametric measures of phenotypic stability in four annual crops. Middle Eastern and Russian Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology, 3(1): 20-24.
30. Mortazavian, S.M.M. and Azizinia, S.H. (2014). Nonparametric stability analysis in multi-environment trial of canola. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 19(1): 108-117.
31. Najafi Mirak, T. (2011). Study of grain yield stability of bread wheat genotypes in cold agro-climatic zone of Iran. Iranian Journal of Crop Science, 13(2): 380-394 (In Persian).
32. Najafi Mirak, T., Dastfal, M., Andarzian, B., Farzadi, H., Bahari, M. and Zali, H. (2018a). Assessment of non-parametric methods in selection of stable genotypes of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum). Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 19(2): 126-138 (In Persian).
33. Najafi Mirak, T., Dastfal, M., Andarzian, B., Farzadi, H., Bahari, M. and Zali, H. (2018b). Stability analysis of grain yield of durum wheat promising lines in warm and dry areas using parametric and non-parametric methods. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 8(2): 79-96.
34. Najafian, G., Kaffashi, A.K. and Jafar-Nezhad, A. (2010). Analysis of grain yield stability in hexaploid wheat genotypes grown in temperate regions of Iran using additive main effects and multiplicative interaction. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 12: 213-222.
35. Nassar, R. and Huhn, M. (1987). Studies on estimation of phenotypic stability: Test of significance for non- parametric measures of phenotypic stability. Biometrics, 43: 45-53.
36. Pinthus, M.J. (1973). Estimate of genotypic value: A proposed method. Euphytica, 22: 121-123.
37. Plaisted, R.L. (1960). A shorter method for evaluating the ability of selections to yield consistently over locations. American Potato Journal, 37: 166-172.
38. Plaisted, R.L. and Peterson, L.C. (1959). A technique for evaluating the ability of selections to yield consistently in different locations or seasons. American Potato Journal, 36: 381-385.
39. Radmehr, A. (1990). Methods of Wheat Breeding in CIMMYT. Khuzestan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Ahvaz, IR (In Persian).
40. Roemer, J. (1917). Sinde die ertagdreichen Sorten ertagissicherer? DLG-Mitteilungen, 32: 87-89.
41. Sabaghnia, N., Karimizadeh, R. and Mohammadi, M. (2012). Genotype by environment interaction and stability analysis for grain yield of Lentil genotypes. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture, 3: 305-312.
42. Sadeghzadeh, B., Mohammadi, R., Ahmadi, H., Abediasl, G.R., Ahmadi, M.M., Mohammadfam, M., Bahrami, N., Khaledian, M.S. and Naserian, A.A. (2018). GGE biplot and AMMI application in the study of adaptability and grain yield stability of durum lines under dryland conditions. Environmental Stresses in Crop Sciences, 11(2): 241-260.
43. Sharifi, P., Aminpanah, H., Erfani, R., Mohaddesi, A. and Abbasian, A. (2017). Evaluation of Genotype × Environment Interaction in Rice Based on AMMI model in Iran. Rice Science, 24(3): 173-180.
44. Shukla, G.K. (1972). Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype × environmental components of variability. Heredity, 29: 237-245.
45. Tai, G.C.C. (1971). Genotypic stability analysis and application to potato regional trials. Crop Science, 11: 184-190.
46. Tarinejad, A. (2017). Grain yield stability of some bread wheat cultivars introduced in moderate and cold area of Iran. Journal of Eco-physiology, 11(2): 437-452 (In Persian).
47. Temesgen, T., Keneni, G., Sefera, T., and Jarso, M. (2015). Yield stability and relationships among stability parameters in Faba bean (Vicia faba L.) genotypes. The Crop Journal, 3: 258-268.
48. Thennarasu, K. (1995). On certain nonparametric procedures for studying genotype environment interactions and yield stability. PhD. Thesis, PJ School IARI, New Delhi, India.
49. Trethowan, R., and Reynolds, M. (2007). Drought resistance: genetic approaches for improving productivity under stress, In: Trethowan R.M. and Reynolds, M., Eds., Wheat Production in Stressed Environments, pp. 289-299. Springer Pub., NL. [DOI:10.1007/1-4020-5497-1_37]
50. Wricke, G. (1962). Uber eine methode zur refassung der okologischen streubretite in feldversuchen, Flazenzuecht, 47: 92-96.
51. Yan, W., Hunt, L.A., Sheny, Q. and Szlavnics, Z. (2000). Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Science, 40: 597-605.
52. Yan, W., Kang, M.S., Ma, B., Wood, S. and Cornelious, P.L. (2007). GGE biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype by environment data. Crop Science, 47: 643-655.
53. Zarei Soltankohi, M. and Farshadfar, M. (2016). Evaluation of genotype × environment interaction in landraces of common wheat using non-parametric stability indicators. Biological Forum-An International Journal, 7(1): 945-950.
ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول

ارسال نظر درباره این مقاله
نام کاربری یا پست الکترونیک شما:

CAPTCHA



XML   English Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Karimizadeh R, Hosseinpour T, Alt Jafarby J, Shahbazi Homonlo K, Armion M. Evaluation of Genotype × Environment Interaction and Determining Grain Yield Stability of Durum Wheat Genotypes in Uniform Regional Yield Trials in Semi-Warm Rainfed Areas. pgr. 2021; 7 (2) :25-40
URL: http://pgr.lu.ac.ir/article-1-192-fa.html

کریمی زاده رحمت الله، حسین پور طهماسب، آلت‌جعفربای جبار، شهبازی هومونلو کمال، آرمیون محمد. ارزیابی اثر متقابل ژنوتیپ × محیط و ‌تعیین پایداری عملکرد دانه ژنوتیپ‌های گندم دوروم در آزمایش‌های یکنواخت سراسری مناطق نیمه‌گرمسیر دیم. پژوهش های ژنتیک گیاهی. 1399; 7 (2) :40-25

URL: http://pgr.lu.ac.ir/article-1-192-fa.html



بازنشر اطلاعات
Creative Commons License این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است.
دوره 7، شماره 2 - ( 1399 ) برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
پژوهش های ژنتیک گیاهی Plant Genetic Researches
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.14 seconds with 30 queries by YEKTAWEB 4461